Beforeweturnspecificallytothenewworldofthewest,itremainstotakenoteofwhatmayperhapsberegardedastheverygreatestachievementofancientscience。Thiswastheanalysisofspeechsounds,andtheresultingdevelopmentofasystemofalphabeticalwriting。Tocomprehendtheseriesofscientificinductionswhichledtothisresult,wemustgobackinimaginationandtracebrieflythedevelopmentofthemethodsofrecordingthoughtbymeansofgraphicsymbols。Inotherwords,wemusttracetheevolutionoftheartofwriting。Indoingsowecannotholdtonationallinesaswehavedoneintheprecedingtwochapters,thoughtheeffortsofthetwogreatscientificnationsjustconsideredwillenterprominentlyintothestory。
ThefamiliarGreeklegendassuresusthataPhoeniciannamedKadmuswasthefirsttobringaknowledgeoflettersintoEurope。
Anelaborationofthestory,currentthroughoutclassicaltimes,offeredthefurtherexplanationthatthePhoenicianshadinturnacquiredtheartofwritingfromtheEgyptiansorBabylonians。
Knowledgeastothetrueoriginanddevelopmentoftheartofwritingdidnotextendinantiquitybeyondsuchvagariesasthese。Nineteenth-centurystudiesgavethefirstrealclewstoanunderstandingofthesubject。ThesestudiestendedtoauthenticatetheessentialfactonwhichthelegendofKadmuswasfounded;totheextent,atleast,ofmakingitprobablethatthelaterGrecianalphabetwasintroducedfromPhoenicia——thoughnot,ofcourse,byanyindividualnamedKadmus,thelatterbeing,indeed,anameofpurelyGreekorigin。FurtherstudiesofthepastgenerationtendedtocorroboratetheancientbeliefastotheoriginalsourceofthePhoenicianalphabet,butdividedscholarsbetweentwoopinions:theonecontendingthattheEgyptianhieroglyphicswerethesourceuponwhichthePhoeniciansdrew;andtheothercontendingwithequalfervorthattheBabylonianwedgecharactermustbeconcededthathonor。
But,ashasoftenhappenedinotherfieldsafteryearsofacrimoniouscontroversy,anewdiscoveryortwomaysufficetoshowthatneithercontestantwasright。AftertheEgyptologistsoftheschoolofDeRouge[1]thoughttheyhaddemonstratedthatthefamiliarsymbolsofthePhoenicianalphabethadbeencopiedfromthatmodifiedformofEgyptianhieroglyphicsknownasthehieraticwriting,theAssyriologistscameforwardtoprovethatcertaincharactersoftheBabyloniansyllabaryalsoshowalikenesstothealphabeticalcharactersthatseeminglycouldnotbeduetochance。Andthen,whenasettlementofthedisputeseemedalmosthopeless,itwasshownthroughtheEgyptianexcavationsthatcharactersevenmorecloselyresemblingthoseindisputehadbeeninuseallabouttheshoresoftheMediterranean,quiteindependentlyofeitherEgyptianorAssyrianwritings,fromperiodssoancientastobevirtuallyprehistoric。
CoupledwiththisdisconcertingdiscoveryaretherevelationsbroughttolightbytheexcavationsatthesitesofKnossosandotherlong-buriedcitiesoftheislandofCrete。[2]Theseexcavations,whicharestillinprogress,showthattheartofwritingwasknownandpractisedindependentlyinCretebeforethatcataclysmicoverthrowoftheearlyGreekcivilizationwhicharchaeologistsareaccustomedtoascribetothehypotheticalinvasionoftheDorians。ThesignificanceofthisisthattheartofwritingwasknowninEuropelongbeforetheadventofthemythicalKadmus。ButsincetheearlyCretanscriptsarenottobeidentifiedwiththescriptsusedinGreeceinhistoricaltimes,whereasthelatterareundoubtedlyoflinealdescentfromthePhoenicianalphabet,thevalidityoftheKadmuslegend,inamodifiedform,muststillbeadmitted。
Ashasjustbeensuggested,thenewknowledge,particularlythatwhichrelatedtothegreatantiquityofcharacterssimilartothePhoenicianalphabeticalsigns,issomewhatdisconcerting。Itsgeneraltrend,however,isquiteinthesamedirectionwithmostofthenewarchaeologicalknowledgeofrecentdecades——thatistosay,ittendstoemphasizetheideathathumancivilizationinmostofitsimportantelaborationsisvastlyolderthanhashithertobeensupposed。Itmaybeadded,however,thatnodefiniteclewsareasyetavailablethatenableustofixevenanapproximatedatefortheoriginofthePhoenicianalphabet。Thesigns,towhichreferencehasbeenmade,maywellhavebeeninexistenceforthousandsofyears,utilizedmerelyaspropertymarks,symbolsforcountingandthelike,beforetheideaofsettingthemasideasphoneticsymbolswaseverconceived。
Nothingismorecertain,inthejudgmentofthepresent-dayinvestigator,thanthatmanlearnedtowritebyslowandpainfulstages。Itisprobablethattheconceptionofsuchananalysisofspeechsoundsaswouldmaketheideaofanalphabetpossiblecameataverylatestageofsocialevolution,andastheculminatingachievementofalongseriesofimprovementsintheartofwriting。Theprecisestepsthatmarkedthispathofintellectualdevelopmentcanforthemostpartbeknownonlybyinference;yetitisprobablethatthemainchaptersofthestorymaybereproducedwithessentialaccuracy。
FIRSTSTEPS
Fortheveryfirstchaptersofthestorywemustgobackinimaginationtotheprehistoricperiod。Evenbarbaricmanfeelstheneedofself-expression,andstrivestomakehisideasmanifesttoothermenbypictorialsigns。Thecave-dwellersscratchedpicturesofmenandanimalsonthesurfaceofareindeerhornormammothtuskasmementosofhisprowess。TheAmericanIndiandoesessentiallythesamethingto-day,makingpicturesthatcrudelyrecordhissuccessesinwarandthechase。
TheNorthernIndianhadgotnofartherthanthiswhenthewhitemandiscoveredAmerica;buttheAztecsoftheSouthwestandtheMayapeopleofYucatanhadcarriedtheirpicture-makingtoamuchhigherstateofelaboration。[3]Theyhaddevelopedsystemsofpictographsorhieroglyphicsthatwoulddoubtlessinthecourseofgenerationshavebeenelaboratedintoalphabeticalsystems,hadnottheEuropeanscutoffthecivilizationofwhichtheywerethehighestexponents。
WhattheAztecandMayawerestrivingtowardsinthesixteenthcenturyA。D。,variousOrientalnationshadattainedatleastfiveorsixthousandyearsearlier。InEgyptatthetimeofthepyramid-builders,andinBabyloniaatthesameepoch,thepeoplehaddevelopedsystemsofwritingthatenabledthemnotmerelytopresentalimitedrangeofideaspictorially,buttoexpressinfullelaborationandwithfinershadesofmeaningalltheideasthatpertaintohighlyculturedexistence。Themanofthattimemaderecordsofmilitaryachievements,recordedthetransactionsofevery-daybusinesslife,andgaveexpressiontohismoralandspiritualaspirationsinawaystrangelycomparabletothemannerofourowntime。Hehadperfectedhighlyelaboratesystemsofwriting。
EGYPTIANWRITING
Ofthetwoancientsystemsofwritingjustreferredtoasbeinginvogueattheso-calleddawningsofhistory,themorepicturesqueandsuggestivewasthehieroglyphicsystemoftheEgyptians。Thisisacuriouslyconglomeratesystemofwriting,madeupinpartofsymbolsreminiscentofthecrudeststagesofpicture-writing,inpartofsymbolshavingthephoneticvalueofsyllables,andinpartoftruealphabeticalletters。Inaword,theEgyptianwritingrepresentsinitselftheelementsofthevariousstagesthroughwhichtheartofwritinghasdeveloped。[4]
Wemustconceivethatnewfeatureswerefromtimetotimeaddedtoit,whiletheoldfeatures,curiouslyenough,werenotgivenup。
Here,forexample,inthemidstofunintelligiblelinesandpot-hooks,arevariouspicturesthatareinstantlyrecognizableasrepresentationsofhawks,lions,ibises,andthelike。Itcanhardlybequestionedthatwhenthesepictureswerefirstusedcalligraphicallytheyweremeanttorepresenttheideaofabirdoranimal。Inotherwords,thefirststageofpicture-writingdidnotgobeyondthemererepresentationofaneaglebythepictureofaneagle。Butthis,obviously,wouldconfinethepresentationofideaswithinverynarrowlimits。Induecoursesomeinventivegeniusconceivedthethoughtofsymbolizingapicture。Tohimtheoutlineofaneaglemightrepresentnotmerelyanactualbird,butthethoughtofstrength,ofcourage,orofswiftprogress。
Suchauseofsymbolsobviouslyextendstherangeofutilityofanascentartofwriting。Theninduecoursesomewonderfulpsychologist——orperhapsthejointeffortsofmanygenerationsofpsychologists——madetheastoundingdiscoverythatthehumanvoice,whichseemstoflowoninanunbrokenstreamofendlesslyvariedmodulationsandintonations,mayreallybeanalyzedintoacomparativelylimitednumberofcomponentsounds——intoafewhundredsofsyllables。Thatwonderfulideaconceived,itwasonlyamatteroftimeuntilitwouldoccurtosomeotherenterprisinggeniusthatbyselectinganarbitrarysymboltorepresenteachoneoftheseelementarysoundsitwouldbepossibletomakeawrittenrecordofthewordsofhumanspeechwhichcouldbereproduced——rephonated——bysomeonewhohadneverheardthewordsanddidnotknowinadvancewhatthiswrittenrecordcontained。
This,ofcourse,iswhateverychildlearnstodonowintheprimerclass,butwemayfeelassuredthatsuchanideaneveroccurredtoanyhumanbeinguntilthepeculiarformsofpictographicwritingjustreferredtohadbeenpractisedformanycenturies。Yet,aswehavesaid,somegeniusofprehistoricEgyptconceivedtheideaandputitintopracticalexecution,andthehieroglyphicwritingofwhichtheEgyptianswereinfullpossessionattheverybeginningofwhatwetermthehistoricalperiodmadeuseofthisphoneticsystemalongwiththeideographicsystemalreadydescribed。
SofondweretheEgyptiansoftheirpictorialsymbolsusedideographicallythattheyclungtothempersistentlythroughouttheentireperiodofEgyptianhistory。Theyusedsymbolsasphoneticequivalentsveryfrequently,buttheyneverlearnedtodependuponthemexclusively。Thescribealwaysinterspersedhisphoneticsignswithsomeothersignsintendedasgraphicaids。
Afterspellingawordoutinfull,headdedapicture,sometimeseventwoorthreepictures,representativeoftheindividualthing,oratleastofthetypeofthingtowhichthewordbelongs。Twoorthreeillustrationswillmakethisclear。
Thusqeften,monkey,isspelledoutinfull,butthepictureofamonkeyisaddedasadeterminative;second,qenu,cavalry,afterbeingspelled,ismadeunequivocalbytheintroductionofapictureofahorse;third,temati,wings,thoughspelledelaborately,haspicturesofwingsadded;andfourth,tatu,quadrupeds,afterbeingspelled,hasapictureofaquadruped,andthenthepictureofahide,whichistheusualdeterminativeofaquadruped,followedbythreedashestoindicatethepluralnumber。
Itmustnotbesupposed,however,thatitwasamerewhimwhichledtheEgyptianstotheuseofthissystemofdeterminatives。
Therewassoundreasonbackofit。Itamountedtonomorethantheexpedientweadoptwhenwespell"to,""two,"or"too,"inindicationofasinglesoundwiththreedifferentmeanings。TheEgyptianlanguageaboundsinwordshavingmorethanonemeaning,andinwritingtheseitisobviousthatsomemeansofdistinctionisdesirable。ThesamethingoccursevenmorefrequentlyintheChineselanguage,whichismonosyllabic。TheChineseadoptamoreclumsyexpedient,supplyingadifferentsymbolforeachofthemeaningsofasyllable;sothatwhiletheactualword-soundsoftheirspeechareonlyafewhundredsinnumber,thecharactersoftheirwrittenlanguagemounthighintothethousands。
BABYLONIANWRITING
WhilethecivilizationoftheNileValleywasdevelopingthisextraordinarysystemofhieroglyphics,theinhabitantsofBabyloniawerepractisingtheartofwritingalongsomewhatdifferentlines。Itiscertainthattheybeganwithpicture-making,andthatinduecoursetheyadvancedtothedevelopmentofthesyllabary;but,unliketheirEgyptiancousins,themenofBabyloniasawfittodiscardtheoldsystemwhentheyhadperfectedabetterone。[5]Soataveryearlydaytheirwriting——asrevealedtousnowthroughtherecentexcavations——hadceasedtohavethatpictorialaspectwhichdistinguishestheEgyptianscript。Whathadoriginallybeenpicturesofobjects——fish,houses,andthelike——hadcometoberepresentedbymereaggregationsofwedge-shapedmarks。AsthewritingoftheBabvlonianswaschieflyinscribedonsoftclay,theadaptationofthiswedge-shapedmarkinlieuofanordinarylinewasprobablyamerematterofconvenience,sincethesharp-corneredimplementusedinmakingtheinscriptionnaturallymadeawedge-shapedimpressionintheclay。That,however,isadetail。TheessentialthingisthattheBabylonianhadsofullyanalyzedthespeech-soundsthathefeltentireconfidenceinthem,andhavingselectedasufficientnumberofconventionalcharacters——eachmadeupofwedge-shapedlines——torepresentallthephoneticsoundsofhislanguage,spelledthewordsoutinsyllablesandtosomeextentdispensedwiththedeterminativesignswhich,aswehaveseen,playedsoprominentapartintheEgyptianwriting。HiscousinstheAssyriansusedhabituallyasystemofwritingthefoundationofwhichwasanelaboratephoneticsyllabary;asystem,therefore,farremovedfromtheoldcrudepictograph,andinsomerespectsmuchmoredevelopedthanthecomplicatedEgyptianmethod;yet,afterall,asystemthatstoppedshortofperfectionbythewidegapthatseparatesthesyllabaryfromthetruealphabet。
Abriefanalysisofspeechsoundswillaidusinunderstandingtherealnatureofthesyllabary。Letustakeforconsiderationtheconsonantalsoundrepresentedbytheletterb。Amoment’sconsiderationwillmakeitclearthatthissoundentersintoalargenumberofsyllables。Thereare,forexample,atleasttwentyvowelsoundsintheEnglishlanguage,nottospeakofcertaindigraphs;thatistosay,eachoftheimportantvowelshasfromtwotosixsounds。Eachofthesevowelsoundsmayenterintocombinationwiththebsoundalonetoformthreesyllables;
asba,ab,bal,be,eb,bel,etc。Thusthereareatleastsixtyb-soundsyllables。Butthisisnottheend,forotherconsonantalsoundsmaybeassociatedinthesyllablesinsuchcombinationsasbad,bed,bar,bark,cab,etc。Aseachoftheothertwentyoddconsonantalsoundsmayenterintosimilarcombinations,itisobviousthatthereareseveralhundredsoffundamentalsyllablestobetakenintoaccountinanysyllabicsystemofwriting。Foreachofthesesyllablesasymbolmustbesetasideandheldinreserveastherepresentativeofthatparticularsound。Aperfectsyllabary,then,wouldrequiresomehundredormoreofsymbolstorepresentbsoundsalone;andsincethesoundsforc,d,f,andtherestareequallyvaried,theentiresyllabarywouldrunintothousandsofcharacters,almostrivallingincomplexitytheChinesesystem。Butinpracticethemostperfectsyllabary,SuchasthatoftheBabylonians,fellshortofthisdegreeofprecisionthroughignoringtheminorshadesofsound;justasourownalphabetiscontenttorepresentsomethirtyvowelsoundsbyfiveletters,ignoringthefactthata,forexample,hasreallyhalfadozendistinctphoneticvalues。Bysuchslurringofsoundsthesyllabaryisreducedfarbelowitsideallimits;yetevensoitretainsthreeorfourhundredcharacters。
Inpointoffact,suchaworkasProfessorDelitzsch’sAssyrianGrammar[6]presentssignsforthreehundredandthirty-foursyllables,togetherwithsundryalternativesignsanddeterminativestotaxthememoryofthewould-bereaderofAssyrian。Letustakeforexampleafewofthebsounds。IthasbeenexplainedthatthebasisoftheAssyrianwrittencharacterisasimplewedge-shapedorarrow-headmark。Variouslyrepeatedandgrouped,thesemarksmakeupthesyllabiccharacters。
Tolearnsomefourhundredsuchsignsasthesewasthetaskset,asanequivalentoflearningtheabc’s,toanyprimerclassinoldAssyriainthelonggenerationswhenthatlandwasthecultureCentreoftheworld。NorwasthetaskconfinedtothenativesofBabyloniaandAssyriaalone。AboutthefifteenthcenturyB。C。,andprobablyforalongtimebeforeandafterthatperiod,theexceedinglycomplexsyllabaryoftheBabylonianswastheofficialmeansofcommunicationthroughoutwesternAsiaandbetweenAsiaandEgypt,asweknowfromthechancediscoveryofacollectionoflettersbelongingtotheEgyptiankingKhun-aten,preservedatTel-el-Amarna。InthetimeofRamsestheGreattheBabylonianwritingwasinallprobabilityconsideredbyamajorityofthemosthighlycivilizedpeopleintheworldtobethemostperfectscriptpracticable。Doubtlesstheaveragescribeofthetimedidnotintheleastrealizethewasteofenergyinvolvedinhislabors,oreversuspectthattherecouldbeanybetterwayofwriting。
Yettheanalysisofanyoneofthesehundredsofsyllablesintoitscomponentphoneticelements——hadanyonebeengeniusenoughtomakesuchanalysis——ouldhavegiventhekeytosimplerandbetterthings。Butsuchananalysiswasveryhardtomake,asthesequelshows。Noristheutilityofsuchananalysisself-evident,astheexperienceoftheEgyptiansproved。Thevowelsoundissointimatelylinkedwiththeconsonant——thecon-sonant,implyingthisintimaterelationinitsveryname——thatitseemedextremelydifficulttogiveitindividualrecognition。Tosetoffthemerelabialbeginningofthesoundbyitself,andtorecognizeitasanall-essentialelementofphonation,wasthefeatatwhichhumanintelligencesolongbalked。Thegermofgreatthingslayinthatanalysis。Itwasaprocessofsimplification,andallartdevelopmentisfromthecomplextothesimple。Unfortunately,however,itdidnotseemasimplification,butratherquitethereverse。Wemaywellsupposethattheideaofwrestingfromthesyllabaryitssecretofconsonantsandvowels,andgivingtoeachconsonantalsoundadistinctsign,seemedamostcumbersomeandembarrassingcomplicationtotheancientscholars——thatistosay,afterthetimearrivedwhenanyonegavesuchanideaexpression。Wecanimaginethemsaying:"Youwillobligeustousefoursignsinsteadofonetowritesuchanelementarysyllableas’bard,’
forexample。Outuponsuchendlessperplexity!"Norissuchasuggestionpurelygratuitous,foritisanhistoricalfactthattheoldsyllabarycontinuedtobeusedinBabylonhundredsofyearsafterthealphabeticalsystemhadbeenintroduced。[7]
Customiseverythinginestablishingourprejudices。TheJapaneseto-dayrebelagainsttheintroductionofanalphabet,thinkingitambiguous。
Yet,intheend,conservatismalwaysyields,andsoitwaswithoppositiontothealphabet。Oncetheideaoftheconsonanthadbeenfirmlygrasped,theoldsyllabarywasdoomed,thoughgenerationsoftimemightberequiredtocompletetheobsequies——generationsoftimeandtheinfluenceofanewnation。
Wehavenowtoinquirehowandbywhomthisadvancewasmade。
Wecannotbelievethatanynationcouldhavevaultedtothefinalstageofthesimplealphabeticalwritingwithouttracingthedeviousanddifficultwayofthepictographandthesyllabary。Itispossible,however,foracultivatednationtobuildupontheshouldersofitsneighbors,and,profitingbytheexperienceofothers,tomakesuddenleapsupwardandonward。Andthisisseeminglywhathappenedinthefinaldevelopmentoftheartofwriting。ForwhiletheBabyloniansandAssyriansrestedcontentwiththeirelaboratesyllabary,anationoneithersideofthem,geographicallyspeaking,solvedtheproblem,whichtheyperhapsdidnotevenrecognizeasaproblem;wrestedfromtheirsyllabaryitssecretofconsonantsandvowels,andbyadoptinganarbitrarysignforeachconsonantalsound,producedthatmostwonderfulofhumaninventions,thealphabet。
ThetwonationscreditedwiththiswonderfulachievementarethePhoeniciansandthePersians。Butitisnotusuallyconcededthatthetwoareentitledtoanythinglikeequalcredit。ThePersians,probablyinthetimeofCyrustheGreat,usedcertaincharactersoftheBabylonianscriptfortheconstructionofanalphabet;butatthistimethePhoenicianalphabethadundoubtedlybeeninuseforsomecenturies,anditismorethanprobablethatthePersianborrowedhisideaofanalphabetfromaPhoeniciansource。Andthat,ofcourse,makesallthedifference。Grantedtheideaofanalphabet,itrequiresnogreatreachofconstructivegeniustosupplyasetofalphabeticalcharacters;thoughevenhere,itmaybeaddedparenthetically,astudyofthedevelopmentofalphabetswillshowthatmankindhasallalonghadacharacteristicpropensitytocopyratherthantoinvent。
RegardingthePersianalphabet-maker,then,asacopyistratherthanatrueinventor,itremainstoturnattentiontothePhoeniciansourcewhence,asiscommonlybelieved,theoriginalalphabetwhichbecame"themotherofallexistingalphabets"cameintobeing。ItmustbeadmittedattheoutsetthatevidenceforthePhoenicianoriginofthisalphabetistraditionalratherthandemonstrative。ThePhoenicianswerethegreattradersofantiquity;undoubtedlytheywerelargelyresponsibleforthetransmissionofthealphabetfromonepartoftheworldtoanother,onceithadbeeninvented。Toomuchcreditcannotbegiventhemforthis;andastheworldalwayshonorshimwhomakesanideafertileratherthantheoriginatoroftheidea,therecanbelittleinjusticeincontinuingtospeakofthePhoeniciansastheinventorsofthealphabet。Buttheactualfactsofthecasewillprobablyneverbeknown。Foraughtweknow,itmayhavebeensomedreamy-eyedIsraelite,someBabylonianphilosopher,someEgyptianmystic,perhapsevensomeobscureCretan,whogavetothehard-headedPhoeniciantraderthisconceptionofadismemberedsyllablewithitsall-essential,elemental,wonder-workingconsonant。Butitisfutilenowtoattempteventosurmiseonsuchunfathomabledetailsasthese。Sufficeitthattheanalysiswasmade;thatonesignandnomorewasadoptedforeachconsonantalsoundoftheSemitictongue,andthattheentirecumbersomemechanismoftheEgyptianandBabylonianwritingsystemswasrenderedobsolescent。Thesesystemsdidnotyieldatonce,tobesure;allhumanexperiencewouldhavebeensetatnaughthadtheydoneso。Theyheldtheirown,andmuchmorethanheldtheirown,formanycenturies。AfterthePhoeniciansasanationhadceasedtohaveimportance;aftertheiroriginalscripthadbeenendlesslymodifiedbymanyaliennations;aftertheoriginalalphabethadmadetheconquestofallcivilizedEuropeandoffaroutlyingportionsoftheOrient——theEgyptianandBabylonianscribescontinuedtoinditetheirmissivesinthesameoldpictographsandsyllables。
Theinventivethinkermusthavebeenstruckwithamazementwhen,aftermakingthefullestanalysisofspeech-soundsofwhichhewascapable,hefoundhimselfsuppliedwithonlyascoreorsoofsymbols。YetasregardstheconsonantalsoundshehadexhaustedtheresourcesoftheSemitictongue。Astovowels,hescarcelyconsideredthematall。Itseemedtohimsufficienttouseonesymbolforeachconsonantalsound。Thisreducedthehithertocomplexmechanismofwritingtososimpleasystemthattheinventormusthaveregardeditwithsheerdelight。Ontheotherhand,theconservativescholardoubtlessthoughtitdistinctlyambiguous。Intruth,itmustbeadmittedthatthesystemwasimperfect。Itwasavastimprovementontheoldsyllabary,butithaditsdrawbacks。Perhapsithadbeenmadeabittoosimple;
certainlyitshouldhavehadsymbolsforthevowelsoundsaswellasfortheconsonants。Nevertheless,thevowel-lackingalphabetseemstohavetakenthepopularfancy,andtothisdaySemiticpeoplehaveneversupplieditsdeficienciessavewithcertaindotsandpoints。
PeoplesusingtheAryanspeechsoonsawthedefect,andtheGreekssuppliedsymbolsforseveralnewsoundsataveryearlyday。[8]Buttherethematterrested,andthealphabethasremainedimperfect。ForthepurposesoftheEnglishlanguagethereshouldcertainlyhavebeenaddedadozenormorenewcharacters。Itisclear,forexample,that,intheinterestofexplicitness,weshouldhaveaseparatesymbolforthevowelsoundineachofthefollowingsyllables:bar,bay,bann,ball,tociteasingleillustration。
Thereis,tobesure,aseeminglyvalidreasonfornotextendingouralphabet,inthefactthatinmultiplyingsyllablesitwouldbedifficulttoselectcharactersatonceeasytomakeandunambiguous。Moreover,theconservativesmightpointout,withtellingeffect,thatthepresentalphabethasprovedadmirablyeffectiveforaboutthreethousandyears。Yetthefactthatourdictionariessupplydiacriticalmarksforsomethirtyvowelssoundstoindicatethepronunciationofthewordsofourevery-dayspeech,showshowweletmemoryandguessingdotheworkthatmightreasonablybedemandedofareallycompletealphabet。But,whateveritsdefects,theexistingalphabetisamarvellouspieceofmechanism,theresultofthousandsofyearsofintellectualeffort。Itis,perhapswithoutexception,themoststupendousinventionofthehumanintellectwithinhistoricaltimes——anachievementtakingrankwithsuchgreatprehistoricdiscoveriesastheuseofarticulatespeech,themakingofafire,andtheinventionofstoneimplements,ofthewheelandaxle,andofpicture-writing。Itmadepossibleforthefirsttimethateducationofthemassesuponwhichalllaterprogressofcivilizationwassolargelytodepend。
V。THEBEGINNINGSOFGREEKSCIENCE
Herodotus,theFatherofHistory,tellsusthatonceuponatime——whichtime,asthemoderncomputatorshowsus,wasabouttheyear590B。C——awarhadrisenbetweentheLydiansandtheMedesandcontinuedfiveyears。"IntheseyearstheMedesoftendiscomfitedtheLydiansandtheLydiansoftendiscomfitedtheMedes(andamongotherthingstheyfoughtabattlebynight);andyettheystillcarriedonthewarwithequallybalancedfortitude。Inthesixthyearabattletookplaceinwhichithappened,whenthefighthadbegun,thatsuddenlythedaybecamenight。AndthischangeofthedayThales,theMilesian,hadforetoldtotheIonians,layingdownasalimitthisveryyearinwhichthechangetookplace。TheLydians,however,andtheMedes,whentheysawthatithadbecomenightinsteadofday,ceasedfromtheirfightingandweremuchmoreeager,bothofthem,thatpeaceshouldbemadebetweenthem。"
ThismemorableincidentoccurredwhileAlyattus,fatherofCroesus,waskingoftheLydians。Themodernastronomer,reckoningbackward,estimatesthiseclipseasoccurringprobablyMay25th,585B。C。Thedateisimportantasfixingamile-stoneinthechronologyofancienthistory,butitisdoublymemorablebecauseitisthefirstrecordedinstanceofapredictedeclipse。
Herodotus,whotellsthestory,wasnotbornuntilaboutonehundredyearsaftertheincidentoccurred,buttimehadnotdimmedthefameofthemanwhohadperformedthenecromanticfeatofprophecy。Thales,theMilesian,thanksinpartatleasttothisaccomplishment,hadbeenknowninlifeasfirstonthelistoftheSevenWiseMenofGreece,andhadpassedintohistoryasthefatherofGreekphilosophy。WemayaddthathehadevenfoundwiderpopularfamethroughbeingnamedbyHippolytus,andthenbyFatheraesop,asthephilosopherwho,intentonstudyingtheheavens,fellintoawell;"whereupon,"saysHippolytus,"amaid-servantnamedThrattalaughedathimandsaid,’Inhissearchforthingsintheskyhedoesnotseewhatisathisfeet。’"
Suchcitationsastheseservetobringvividlytomindthefactthatweareenteringanewepochofthought。Hithertoourstudieshavebeenimpersonal。AmongEgyptiansandBabyloniansalikewehavehadtodealwithclassesofscientificrecords,butwehavescarcelycomeacrossasinglename。Now,however,weshallbegintofindrecordsoftheworkofindividualinvestigators。Ingeneral,fromnowon,weshallbeabletotraceeachgreatidea,ifnottoitsoriginator,atleasttosomeonemanofgeniuswhowasprominentinbringingitbeforetheworld。Thefirstofthesevitalizersofthought,whostandsoutatthebeginningsofGreekhistory,isthissameThales,ofMiletus。Hisisnotaverysharplydefinedpersonalityaswelookbackuponit,andwecanbynomeansbecertainthatallthediscoverieswhichareascribedtohimarespecificallyhis。Ofhisindividualityasamanweknowverylittle。Itisnotevenquitecertainastowherehewasborn;Miletusisusuallyacceptedashisbirthplace,butonetraditionmakeshimbybirthaPhenician。Itisnotatallinquestion,however,thatbybloodhewasatleastinpartanIonianGreek。ItwillberecalledthatintheseventhcenturyB。C。,whenThaleswasborn——andforalongtimethereafter——theeasternshoresoftheaegeanSeawerequiteasprominentlythecentreofGreekinfluenceaswasthepeninsulaofGreeceitself。
NotmerelyThales,buthisfollowersanddisciples,AnaximanderandAnaximenes,werebornthere。SoalsowasHerodotas,theFatherofHistory,nottoextendthelist。Thereisnothinganomalous,then,inthefactthatThales,thefatherofGreekthought,wasbornandpassedhislifeonsoilthatwasnotgeographicallyapartofGreece;butthefacthasanimportantsignificanceofanotherkind。Thankstohisenvironment,ThaleswasnecessarilybroughtmoreorlessincontactwithOrientalideas。TherewasclosecommercialcontactbetweenthelandofhisnativityandthegreatBabyloniancapitalofftotheeast,asalsowithEgypt。DoubtlessthisassociationwasofinfluenceinshapingthedevelopmentofThales’smind。Indeed,itwasanacceptedtraditionthroughoutclassicaltimesthattheMilesianphilosopherhadtravelledinEgypt,andhadtheregainedatleasttherudimentsofhisknowledgeofgeometry。Inthefullestsense,then,ThalesmayberegardedasrepresentingalinkinthechainofthoughtconnectingthelearningoftheoldOrientwiththenascentscholarshipofthenewOccident。Occupyingthisposition,itisfittingthatthepersonalityofThalesshouldpartakesomewhatofmystery;thatthescenemaynotbeshiftedtoosuddenlyfromthevague,impersonalEasttotheindividualismofEurope。
Allofthis,however,mustnotbetakenascastinganydoubtupontheexistenceofThalesasarealperson。Eventhedatesofhislife——640to546B。C——maybeacceptedasatleastapproximatelytrustworthy;andthespecificdiscoveriesascribedtohimillustrateequallywellthestageofdevelopmentofGreekthought,whetherThaleshimselforoneofhisimmediatediscipleswerethediscoverer。WehavealreadymentionedthefeatwhichwassaidtohavegivenThaleshisgreatreputation。ThatThaleswasuniversallycreditedwithhavingpredictedthefamouseclipseisbeyondquestion。Thatheactuallydidpredictitinanyprecisesenseofthewordisopentodoubt。Atallevents,hispredictionwasnotbaseduponanysuchpreciseknowledgeasthatofthemodernastronomer。Thereis,indeed,onlyonewayinwhichhecouldhaveforetoldtheeclipse,andthatisthroughknowledgeoftheregularsuccessionofprecedingeclipses。Butthatknowledgeimpliesaccessonthepartofsomeonetolongseriesofrecordsofpracticalobservationsoftheheavens。Suchrecords,aswehaveseen,existedinEgyptandevenmorenotablyinBabylonia。
ThattheserecordswerethesourceoftheinformationwhichestablishedthereputationofThalesisanunavoidableinference。
Inotherwords,themagicalprevisionofthefatherofGreekthoughtwasbutareflexofOrientalwisdom。Nevertheless,itsufficedtoestablishThalesasthefatherofGreekastronomy。Inpointoffact,hisactualastronomicalattainmentswouldappeartohavebeenmeagreenough。Thereisnothingtoshowthathegainedaninklingofthetruecharacterofthesolarsystem。Hedidnotevenrecognizethesphericityoftheearth,butheld,stillfollowingtheOrientalauthorities,thattheworldisaflatdisk。Evenhisfamouscosmogonicguess,accordingtowhichwateristheessenceofallthingsandtheprimordialelementoutofwhichtheearthwasdeveloped,isbutanelaborationoftheBabylonianconception。
WhenweturntotheotherfieldofthoughtwithwhichthenameofThalesisassociated——namely,geometry——weagainfindevidenceoftheOrientalinfluence。Thescienceofgeometry,Herodotusassuresus,wasinventedinEgypt。Itwasthereaneminentlypracticalscience,beingapplied,asthenameliterallysuggests,tothemeasurementoftheearth’ssurface。HerodotustellsusthattheEgyptianswereobligedtocultivatethesciencebecausetheperiodicalinundationswashedawaytheboundary-linesbetweentheirfarms。Theprimitivegeometer,then,wasasurveyor。TheEgyptianrecords,asnowrevealedtous,showthatthesciencehadnotbeencarriedfarinthelandofitsbirth。TheEgyptiangeometerwasabletomeasureirregularpiecesoflandonlyapproximately。Heneverfullygraspedtheideaoftheperpendicularasthetrueindexofmeasurementforthetriangle,butbasedhiscalculationsuponmeasurementsoftheactualsideofthatfigure。Nevertheless,hehadlearnedtosquarethecirclewithacloseapproximationtothetruth,and,ingeneral,hismeasurementsufficedforallhispracticalneeds。JusthowmuchofthegeometricalknowledgewhichaddedtothefameofThaleswasborroweddirectlyfromtheEgyptians,andhowmuchheactuallycreatedwecannotbesure。Noristhequestionraisedindisparagementofhisgenius。Receptivityisthefirstprerequisitetoprogressivethinking,andthatThalesreachedoutafterandimbibedportionsofOrientalwisdomarguesinitselfforthecreativecharacterofhisgenius。Whetherborroweroforiginator,however,Thalesiscreditedwiththeexpressionofthefollowinggeometricaltruths:
1。Thatthecircleisbisectedbyitsdiameter。
2。Thattheanglesatthebaseofanisoscelestriangleareequal。
3。Thatwhentwostraightlinescuteachothertheverticaloppositeanglesareequal。
4。Thattheangleinasemicircleisarightangle。
5。Thatonesideandoneacuteangleofaright-angletriangledeterminetheothersidesofthetriangle。
ItwasbytheapplicationofthelastoftheseprinciplesthatThalesissaidtohaveperformedthereallynotablefeatofmeasuringthedistanceofashipfromtheshore,hismethodbeingpreciselythesameinprincipleasthatbywhichthegunsaresightedonamodernman-of-war。AnotherpracticaldemonstrationwhichThaleswascreditedwithmaking,andtowhichalsohisgeometricalstudiesledhim,wasthemeasurementofanytallobject,suchasapyramidorbuildingortree,bymeansofitsshadow。Themethod,thoughsimpleenough,wasingenious。Itconsistedmerelyinobservingthemomentofthedaywhenaperpendicularstickcastsashadowequaltoitsownlength。
Obviouslythetreeormonumentwouldalsocastashadowequaltoitsownheightatthesamemoment。Itremainsthenbuttomeasurethelengthofthisshadowtodeterminetheheightoftheobject。
SuchfeatsasthisevidencethepracticalityofthegeniusofThales。TheysuggestthatGreekscience,guidedbyimagination,wasstartingonthehigh-roadofobservation。WearetoldthatThalesconceivedforthefirsttimethegeometryoflines,andthatthis,indeed,constitutedhisrealadvanceupontheEgyptians。Wearetoldalsothatheconceivedtheeclipseofthesunasapurelynaturalphenomenon,andthathereinlayhisadvanceupontheChaldeanpointofview。ButifthisbetrueThaleswasgreatlyinadvanceofhistime,foritwillberecalledthatfullytwohundredyearslatertheGreeksunderNiciasbeforeSyracuseweresodisconcertedbytheappearanceofaneclipse,whichwasinterpretedasadirectomenandwarning,thatNiciasthrewawaythelastopportunitytorescuehisarmy。
Thucydides,itistrue,inrecordingthisfactspeaksdisparaginglyofthesuperstitiousbentofthemindofNicias,butThucydidesalsowasamanfarinadvanceofhistime。
AllthatweknowofthepsychologyofThalesissummedupinthefamousmaxim,"Knowthyself,"amaximwhich,takeninconnectionwiththeprovenreceptivityofthephilosopher’smind,suggeststousamarvellouslyroundedpersonality。
ThedisciplesorsuccessorsofThales,AnaximanderandAnaximenes,werecreditedwithadvancingknowledgethroughtheinventionorintroductionofthesundial。Wemaybesure,however,thatthegnomon,whichistherudimentarysundial,hadbeenknownandusedfromremoteperiodsintheOrient,andthemostthatisprobableisthatAnaximandermayhaveelaboratedsomespecialdesign,possiblythebowl-shapedsundial,throughwhichtheshadowofthegnomonwouldindicatethetime。Thesamephilosopherissaidtohavemadethefirstsketchofageographicalmap,butthisagainisastatementwhichmodernresearcheshaveshowntobefallacious,sinceaBabylonianattemptatdepictingthegeographyoftheworldisstillpreservedtousonaclaytablet。Anaximandermay,however,havebeenthefirstGreektomakeanattemptofthiskind。HereagaintheinfluenceofBabylonianscienceuponthegerminatingWesternthoughtissuggested。
ItissaidthatAnaximanderdepartedfromThales’sconceptionoftheearth,and,itmaybeadded,fromtheBabylonianconceptionalso,inthatheconceiveditasacylinder,orratherasatruncatedcone,theupperendofwhichisthehabitableportion。
ThisconceptionisperhapsthefirstoftheseguessesthroughwhichtheGreekmindattemptedtoexplaintheapparentfixityoftheearth。Toaskwhatsupportstheearthinspaceismostnatural,buttheanswergivenbyAnaximander,likethatmorefamiliarGreeksolutionwhichtransformedthecone,orcylinder,intothegiantAtlas,isbutanotherillustrationofthatsubstitutionofunwarrantedinferenceforscientificinductionwhichwehavealreadysooftenpointedoutascharacteristicoftheprimitivestagesofthought。
Anaximanderheldatleastonetheorywhich,asvouchedforbyvariouscopyistsandcommentators,entitleshimtobeconsideredperhapsthefirstteacheroftheideaoforganicevolution。
Accordingtothisidea,mandevelopedfromafishlikeancestor,"growingupassharksdountilabletohelphimselfandthencomingforthondryland。"[1]Thethoughthereexpressedfindsitsgerm,perhaps,intheBabylonianconceptionthateverythingcameforthfromachaosofwaters。YetthefactthatthethoughtofAnaximanderhascomedowntoposteritythroughsuchvariouschannelssuggeststhattheGreekthinkerhadgotfarenoughawayfromtheOrientalconceptiontomakehisviewseemtohiscontemporariesanovelandindividualone。Indeed,nothingweknowoftheOrientallineofthoughtconveysanysuggestionoftheideaoftransformationofspecies,whereasthatideaisdistinctlyformulatedinthetraditionalviewsofAnaximander。
DiogenesLaertiustellsastoryaboutayouthwho,cladinapurpletoga,enteredthearenaattheOlympiangamesandaskedtocompetewiththeotheryouthsinboxing。Hewasderisivelydeniedadmission,presumablybecausehewasbeyondthelegitimateageforjuvenilecontestants。Nothingdaunted,theyouthenteredthelistsofmen,andturnedthelaughonhiscriticsbycomingoffvictor。TheyouthwhoperformedthisfeatwasnamedPythagoras。
Hewasthesameman,ifwemaycreditthestory,whoafterwardsmigratedtoItalyandbecamethefounderofthefamousCrotonianSchoolofPhilosophy;themanwhodevelopedthereligionoftheOrphicmysteries;whoconceivedtheideaofthemusicofthespheres;whopromulgatedthedoctrineofmetempsychosis;whofirst,perhaps,ofallmenclearlyconceivedthenotionthatthisworldonwhichweliveisaballwhichmovesinspaceandwhichmaybehabitableoneveryside。
Astrangedevelopmentthatforastriplingpugilist。ButwemustnotforgetthatintheGreekworldathleticsheldapeculiarplace。ThechiefwinnerofOlympiangamesgavehisnametoanepoch(theensuingOlympiadoffouryears),andwashonoredalmostbeforeallothersintheland。Asoundmindinasoundbodywasthemottooftheday。Toexcelinfeatsofstrengthanddexteritywasanaccomplishmentthatevenaphilosopherneednotscorn。ItwillberecalledthataeschylusdistinguishedhimselfatthebattleofMarathon;thatThucydides,thegreatestofGreekhistorians,wasageneralinthePeloponnesianWar;thatXenophon,thepupilandbiographerofSocrates,waschieflyfamedforhavingledtheTenThousandinthememorablecampaignofCyrustheYounger;thatPlatohimselfwascreditedwithhavingshowngreataptitudeinearlylifeasawrestler。If,then,PythagorasthephilosopherwasreallythePythagoraswhowontheboxingcontest,wemaysupposethatinlookingbackuponthisathleticfeatfromtheheightsofhispriesthood——forhecametobealmostdeified——heregardeditnotasanindiscretionofhisyouth,butasoneofthegreatestachievementsofhislife。Notunlikelyherecalledwithpridethathewascreditedwithbeingnolessaninnovatorinathleticsthaninphilosophy。Atallevents,traditioncreditshimwiththeinventionof"scientific"
boxing。Wasithe,perhaps,whotaughttheGreekstostrikearisingandswingingblowfromthehip,asdepictedinthefamousmetopesoftheParthenon?Ifso,theinnovationofPythagoraswasaslittleheededinthisregardinasubsequentageaswashistheoryofthemotionoftheearth;fortostrikeaswingingblowfromthehip,ratherthanfromtheshoulder,isatrickwhichthepugilistlearnedanewinourownday。
Butenoughofpugilismandofwhat,atbest,isadoubtfultradition。Ourconcerniswithanother"science"thanthatofthearena。Wemustfollowthepurple-robedvictortoItaly——if,indeed,webenotover-credulousinacceptingthetradition——andlearnoftriumphsofadifferentkindthathaveplacedthenameofPythagorashighonthelistofthefathersofGrecianthought。
ToItaly?Yes,tothewesternlimitsoftheGreekworld。Hereitwas,beyondtheconfinesofactualGreekterritory,thatHellenicthoughtfounditssecondhome,itsfirsthomebeing,aswehaveseen,inAsiaMinor。Pythagoras,indeed,towhomwehavejustbeenintroduced,wasbornontheislandofSamos,whichliesnearthecoastofAsiaMinor,butheprobablymigratedatanearlydaytoCrotona,inItaly。Therehelived,taught,anddevelopedhisphilosophyuntilratherlateinlife,when,havingincurredthedispleasureofhisfellow-citizens,hesufferedthenotunusualpenaltyofbanishment。
OfthethreeothergreatItalicleadersofthoughtoftheearlyperiod,XenophanescameratherlateinlifetoEleaandfoundedthefamousEleaticSchool,ofwhichParmenidesbecamethemostdistinguishedornament。ThesetwowereIonians,andtheylivedinthesixthcenturybeforeourera。Empedocles,theSicilian,wasofDoricorigin。HelivedaboutthemiddleofthefifthcenturyB。C。,atatime,therefore,whenAthenshadattainedapositionofchiefgloryamongtheGreekstates;butthereisnoevidencethatEmpedoclesevervisitedthatcity,thoughitwasrumoredthathereturnedtothePeloponnesustodie。TheothergreatItalicphilosophersjustnamed,living,aswehaveseen,inthepreviouscentury,canscarcelyhavethoughtofAthensasacentreofGreekthought。Indeed,theveryfactthatthesemenlivedinItalymadethatpeninsula,ratherthanthemother-landofGreece,thecentreofHellenicinfluence。Butallthesemen,itmustconstantlybeborneinmind,wereGreeksbybirthandlanguage,fullyrecognizedassuchintheirowntimeandbyposterity。YetthefactthattheylivedinalandwhichwasatnotimeapartofthegeographicalterritoryofGreecemustnotbeforgotten。They,ortheirancestorsofrecentgenerations,hadbeenpioneersamongthoseventuresomecolonistswhoreachedoutintodistantportionsoftheworld,andmadehomesforthemselvesinmuchthesamespiritinwhichcolonistsfromEuropebegantopopulateAmericasometwothousandyearslater。Ingeneral,colonistsfromthedifferentpartsofGreecelocalizedthemselvessomewhatdefinitelyintheirnewhomes;yettheremustnaturallyhavebeenagooddealofcomminglingamongthevariousfamiliesofpioneers,and,toacertainextent,aminglingalsowiththeearlierinhabitantsofthecountry。Thisracialmingling,combinedwiththewell-knownvitalizinginfluenceofthepioneerlife,led,wemaysuppose,toamorerapidandmorevarieddevelopmentthanoccurredamongthehome-stayingGreeks。Inproofofthis,witnesstheremarkableschoolsofphilosophywhich,aswehaveseen,werethusdevelopedattheconfinesoftheGreekworld,andwhichwerepresentlytoinvadeand,asitwere,takebystormthemother-countryitself。
AstothepersonalityofthesepioneerphilosophersoftheWest,ourknowledgeisforthemostpartmoreorlesstraditional。WhathasbeensaidofThalesmayberepeated,inthemain,regardingPythagoras,Parmenides,andEmpedocles。Thattheywererealpersonsisnotatallinquestion,butmuchthatismerelytraditionalhascometobeassociatedwiththeirnames。
Pythagoraswasthesenior,anddoubtlesshisideasmayhaveinfluencedtheothersmoreorless,thougheachisusuallyspokenofasthefounderofanindependentschool。Muchconfusionhasallalongexisted,however,astothepreciseideaswhichweretobeascribedtoeachoftheleaders。Numberlesscommentators,indeed,haveendeavoredtopickoutfromamongthetraditionsofantiquity,aidedbysuchfragments,ofthewritingofthephilosophersashavecomedowntous,theparticularideasthatcharacterizedeachthinker,andtoweavetheseideasintosystems。Butsuchefforts,notwithstandingthementalenergythathasbeenexpendeduponthem,were,ofnecessity,futile,since,inthefirstplace,theancientphilosophersthemselvesdidnotspecializeandsystematizetheirideasaccordingtomodernnotions,and,inthesecondplace,therecordsoftheirindividualteachingshavebeentooscantilypreservedtoserveforthepurposeofclassification。Itisfreelyadmittedthatfablehaswovenanimpenetrablemeshofcontradictionsaboutthepersonalitiesoftheseancientthinkers,anditwouldbefollytohopethatthissameartificerhadbeenlessbusywiththeirbeliefsandtheories。WhenonereadsthatPythagorasadvocatedanexclusivelyvegetablediet,yetthathewasthefirsttotrainathletesonmeatdiet;thathesacrificedonlyinanimatethings,yetthatheofferedupahundredoxeninhonorofhisgreatdiscoveryregardingthesidesofatriangle,andsuchlikeinconsistenciesinthesamebiography,onegainsarealizingsenseoftheextenttowhichdiversetraditionsenterintothestoryasithascomedowntous。Andyetwemustreflectthatmostmenchangetheiropinionsinthecourseofalonglifetime,andthattheantagonisticreportsmaybothbetrue。
Trueorfalse,thesefableshaveanabidinginterest,sincetheyprovetheuniqueandextraordinarycharacterofthepersonalityaboutwhichtheyarewoven。TheallegedwitticismsofaWhistler,inourownday,weredoubtless,forthemostpart,quiteunknowntoWhistlerhimself,yettheyneverwouldhavebeenascribedtohimweretheynotakintowitticismsthathedidoriginate——weretheynot,inshort,typicalexpressionsofhispersonality。Andsooftheheroesofthepast。"Itisnoordinaryman,"saidGeorgeHenryLewes,speakingofPythagoras,"whomfableexaltsintothepoeticregion。Wheneveryoufindromanticormiraculousdeedsattributed,becertainthattheherowasgreatenoughtomaintaintheweightofthecrownofthisfabulousglory。"[1]Wemaynotdoubt,then,thatPythagoras,Parmenides,andEmpedocles,withwhosenamesfablewassobusythroughoutantiquity,weremenofextraordinarypersonality。Weareherechieflyconcerned,however,neitherwiththepersonalityofthemannoryetwiththeprecisedoctrineswhicheachoneofthemtaught。Aknowledgeofthelatterwouldbeinterestingwereitattainable,butintheconfusedstateofthereportsthathavecomedowntouswecannothopetobeabletoascribeeachideawithprecisiontoitspropersource。Atbestwecanmerelyoutline,evenherenottooprecisely,thescientificdoctrineswhichtheItalicphilosophersasawholeseemtohaveadvocated。
Firstandforemost,thereisthedoctrinethattheearthisasphere。Pythagorasissaidtohavebeenthefirstadvocateofthistheory;but,unfortunately,itisreportedalsothatParmenideswasitsauthor。Thisrivalshipforthediscoveryofanimportanttruthweshallseerepeatedoverandoverinmorerecenttimes。Couldweknowthewholetruth,itwouldperhapsappearthattheideaofthesphericityoftheearthwasoriginatedlongbeforethetimeoftheGreekphilosophers。Butitmustbeadmittedthatthereisnorecordofanysorttogivetangiblesupporttosuchanassumption。Sofaraswecanascertain,noEgyptianorBabylonianastronomerevergraspedthewonderfulconceptionthattheearthisround。ThattheItalicGreeksshouldhaveconceivedthatideawasperhapsnotsomuchbecausetheywereastronomersasbecausetheywerepracticalgeographersandgeometers。Pythagoras,aswehavenoted,wasbornatSamos,and,therefore,madearelativelylongseavoyageinpassingtoItaly。Now,aseveryoneknows,themostsimpleandtangibledemonstrationoftheconvexityoftheearth’ssurfaceisfurnishedbyobservationofanapproachingshipatsea。Onacleardayakeeneyemaydiscernthemastandsailsrisinggraduallyabovethehorizon,tobefollowedinduecoursebythehull。Similarly,onapproachingtheshore,highobjectsbecomevisiblebeforethosethatlienearerthewater。ItisatleastaplausiblesuppositionthatPythagorasmayhavemadesuchobservationsastheseduringthevoyageinquestion,andthatthereinmayliethegermofthatwonderfulconceptionoftheworldasasphere。
Towhatextentfurtherproof,basedonthefactthattheearth’sshadowwhenthemooniseclipsedisalwaysconvex,mayhavebeenknowntoPythagoraswecannotsay。ThereisnoproofthatanyoftheItalicphilosophersmadeextensiverecordsofastronomicalobservationsasdidtheEgyptiansandBabylonians;butwemustconstantlyrecallthatthewritingsofclassicalantiquityhavebeenalmostaltogetherdestroyed。Theabsenceofastronomicalrecordsis,therefore,noproofthatsuchrecordsneverexisted。
Pythagoras,itshouldbesaid,isreportedtohavetravelledinEgypt,andhemusttherehavegainedaninklingofastronomicalmethods。Indeed,hespeaksofhimselfspecifically,inaletterquotedbyDiogenes,asonewhoisaccustomedtostudyastronomy。
Yetalatersentenceoftheletter,whichassertsthatthephilosopherisnotalwaysoccupiedaboutspeculationsofhisownfancy,suggesting,asitdoes,thedreamerratherthantheobserver,givesusprobablyatruerglimpseintothephilosopher’smind。Thereis,indeed,reasontosupposethatthedoctrineofthesphericityoftheearthappealedtoPythagoraschieflybecauseitaccordedwithhisconceptionthatthesphereisthemostperfectsolid,justasthecircleisthemostperfectplanesurface。Bethatasitmay,thefactremainsthatwehavehere,asfaraswecantraceitsorigin,thefirstexpressionofthescientifictheorythattheearthisround。HadtheItalicphilosophersaccomplishednothingmorethanthis,theiraccomplishmentwouldnonethelessmarkanepochintheprogressofthought。
ThatPythagoraswasanobserveroftheheavensisfurtherevidencedbythestatementmadebyDiogenes,ontheauthorityofParmenides,thatPythagoraswasthefirstpersonwhodiscoveredorassertedtheidentityofHesperusandLucifer——thatistosay,ofthemorningandtheeveningstar。Thiswasreallyaremarkablediscovery,andonethatwasnodoubtinstrumentallateronindeterminingthattheoryofthemechanicsoftheheavenswhichweshallseeelaboratedpresently。TohavemadesuchadiscoveryarguesagainforthepracticalityofthemindofPythagoras。His,indeed,wouldseemtohavebeenamindinwhichpracticalcommon-sensewasstrangelyblendedwiththecapacityforwideandimaginativegeneralization。Asfurtherevidenceofhispracticality,itisassertedthathewasthefirstpersonwhointroducedmeasuresandweightsamongtheGreeks,thisassertionbeingmadeontheauthorityofAristoxenus。Itwillbeobservedthatheissaidtohaveintroduced,nottohaveinvented,weightsandmeasures,astatementwhichsuggestsaknowledgeonthepartoftheGreeksthatweightsandmeasureswerepreviouslyemployedinEgyptandBabylonia。
Themindthatcouldconceivetheworldasasphereandthatinteresteditselfinweightsandmeasureswas,obviously,amindofthevisualizingtype。Itischaracteristicofthistypeofmindtobeinterestedinthetangibilitiesofgeometry,henceitisnotsurprisingtobetoldthatPythagoras"carriedthatsciencetoperfection。"ThemostfamousdiscoveryofPythagorasinthisfieldwasthatthesquareofthehypotenuseofaright-angledtriangleisequaltothesquaresoftheothersidesofthetriangle。Wehavealreadynotedthefablethathisenthusiasmoverthisdiscoveryledhimtosacrificeahecatomb。
Doubtlessthestoryisapocryphal,butdoubtless,also,itexpressesthetruthastothefervidjoywithwhichthephilosophermusthavecontemplatedtheresultsofhiscreativeimagination。
NolineallegedtohavebeenwrittenbyPythagorashascomedowntous。Wearetoldthatherefrainedfrompublishinghisdoctrines,exceptbywordofmouth。"TheLucaniansandthePeucetians,andtheMessapiansandtheRomans,"weareassured,"flockedaroundhim,comingwitheagernesstohearhisdiscourses;nofewerthansixhundredcametohimeverynight;
andifanyoneofthemhadeverbeenpermittedtoseethemaster,theywroteofittotheirfriendsasiftheyhadgainedsomegreatadvantage。"Nevertheless,weareassuredthatuntilthetimeofPhilolausnodoctrinesofPythagoraswereeverpublished,towhichstatementitisaddedthat"whenthethreecelebratedbookswerepublished,Platowrotetohavethempurchasedforhimforahundredminas。"[2]Butifsuchbooksexisted,theyarelosttothemodernworld,andweareobligedtoaccepttheassertionsofrelativelylatewritersastothetheoriesofthegreatCrotonian。
PerhapswecannotdobetterthanquoteatlengthfromanimportantsummaryoftheremainingdoctrinesofPythagoras,whichDiogeneshimselfquotedfromtheworkofapredecessor。[3]
Despiteitssomewhatinchoatecharacter,thissummaryisamostremarkableone,asabriefanalysisofitscontentswillshow。ItshouldbeexplainedthatAlexander(whoseworkisnowlost)issaidtohavefoundthesedogmassetdowninthecommentariesofPythagoras。Ifthisassertionbeaccepted,wearebroughtonestepnearerthephilosopherhimself。Thesummaryisasfollows:
"Thatthemonadwasthebeginningofeverything。Fromthemonadproceedsanindefiniteduad,whichissubordinatetothemonadastoitscause。Thatfromthemonadandtheindefiniteduadproceednumbers。Andfromnumberssigns。Andfromtheselast,linesofwhichplanefiguresconsist。Andfromplanefiguresarederivedsolidbodies。Andfromsolidbodiessensiblebodies,ofwhichlasttherearefourelements——fire,water,earth,andair。Andthattheworld,whichisinduedwithlifeandintellect,andwhichisofasphericalfigure,havingtheearth,whichisalsospherical,andinhabitedalloverinitscentre,[4]resultsfromacombinationoftheseelements,andderivesitsmotionfromthem;andalsothatthereareantipodes,andthatwhatisbelow,asrespectsus,isaboveinrespectofthem。
"Healsotaughtthatlightanddarkness,andcoldandheat,anddrynessandmoisture,wereequallydividedintheworld;andthatwhileheatwaspredominantitwassummer;whilecoldhadthemastery,itwaswinter;whendrynessprevailed,itwasspring;
andwhenmoisturepreponderated,winter。Andwhileallthesequalitieswereonalevel,thenwastheloveliestseasonoftheyear;ofwhichtheflourishingspringwasthewholesomeperiod,andtheseasonofautumnthemostperniciousone。Oftheday,hesaidthattheflourishingperiodwasthemorning,andthefadingonetheevening;onwhichaccountthatalsowastheleasthealthytime。
"Anotherofhistheorieswasthattheairaroundtheearthwasimmovableandpregnantwithdisease,andthateverythinginitwasmortal;butthattheupperairwasinperpetualmotion,andpureandsalubrious,andthateverythinginthatwasimmortal,andonthataccountdivine。Andthatthesunandthemoonandthestarswereallgods;forinthemthewarmprinciplepredominateswhichisthecauseoflife。Andthatthemoonderivesitslightfromthesun。Andthatthereisarelationshipbetweenmenandthegods,becausemenpartakeofthedivineprinciple;onwhichaccount,also,Godexerciseshisprovidenceforouradvantage。
Also,thatFateisthecauseofthearrangementoftheworldbothgenerallyandparticularly。Moreover,thatarayfromthesunpenetratedboththecoldaetherandthedenseaether;andtheycalltheairthecoldaether,andtheseaandmoisturetheycallthedenseaether。Andthisraydescendsintothedepths,andinthiswayvivifieseverything。Andeverythingwhichpartakesoftheprincipleofheatlives,onwhichaccount,also,plantsareanimatedbeings;butthatalllivingthingshavenotnecessarilysouls。Andthatthesoulisasomethingtomofffromtheaether,bothwarmandcold,fromitspartakingofthecoldaether。Andthatthesoulissomethingdifferentfromlife。Also,thatitisimmortal,becausethatfromwhichithasbeendetachedisimmortal。
"Also,thatanimalsarebornfromoneanotherbyseeds,andthatitisimpossiblefortheretobeanyspontaneousproductionbytheearth。Andthatseedisadropfromthebrainwhichcontainsinitselfawarmvapor;andthatwhenthisisappliedtothewombittransmitsvirtueandmoistureandbloodfromthebrain,fromwhichfleshandsinewsandbonesandhairandthewholebodyareproduced。Andfromthevaporisproducedthesoul,andalsosensation。Andthattheinfantfirstbecomesasolidbodyattheendoffortydays;but,accordingtotheprinciplesofharmony,itisnotperfecttillseven,orperhapsnine,oratmosttenmonths,andthenitisbroughtforth。Andthatitcontainsinitselfalltheprinciplesoflife,whichareallconnectedtogether,andbytheirunionandcombinationformaharmoniouswhole,eachofthemdevelopingitselfattheappointedtime。
"Thesensesingeneral,andespeciallythesight,areavaporofexcessivewarmth,andonthisaccountamanissaidtoseethroughairandthroughwater。Forthehotprincipleisopposedbythecoldone;since,ifthevaporintheeyeswerecold,itwouldhavethesametemperatureastheair,andsowouldbedissipated。Asitis,insomepassageshecallstheeyesthegatesofthesun;andhespeaksinasimilarmannerofhearingandoftheothersenses。
"Healsosaysthatthesoulofmanisdividedintothreeparts:
intointuitionandreasonandmind,andthatthefirstandlastdivisionsarefoundalsoinotheranimals,butthatthemiddleone,reason,isonlyfoundinman。Andthatthechiefabodeofthesoulisinthosepartsofthebodywhicharebetweentheheartandthebrain。Andthatthatportionofitwhichisintheheartisthemind;butthatdeliberationandreasonresideinthebrain。
Moreover,thatthesensesaredropsfromthem;andthatthereasoningsenseisimmortal,buttheothersaremortal。Andthatthesoulisnourishedbytheblood;andthatreasonsarethewindsofthesoul。Thatitisinvisible,andsoareitsreasons,sincetheaetheritselfisinvisible。Thatthelinksofthesoularetheveinsandthearteriesandthenerves。Butthatwhenitisvigorous,andisbyitselfinaquiescentstate,thenitslinksarewordsandactions。Thatwhenitiscastforthupontheearthitwandersabout,resemblingthebody。Moreover,thatMercuryisthestewardofthesouls,andthatonthisaccounthehasthenameofConductor,andCommercial,andInfernal,sinceitishewhoconductsthesoulsfromtheirbodies,andfromearthandsea;andthatheconductsthepuresoulstothehighestregion,andthathedoesnotallowtheimpureonestoapproachthem,nortocomenearoneanother,butcommitsthemtobeboundinindissolublefettersbytheFuries。ThePythagoreansalsoassertthatthewholeairisfullofsouls,andthatthesearethosewhichareaccounteddaemonsandheroes。Also,thatitisbythemthatdreamsaresentamongmen,andalsothetokensofdiseaseandhealth;theselast,too,beingsentnotonlytomen,buttosheepalso,andothercattle。Alsothatitistheywhoareconcernedwithpurificationsandexpiationsandallkindsofdivinationandoracularpredictions,andthingsofthatkind。"[5]
AbriefconsiderationofthissummaryofthedoctrinesofPythagoraswillshowthatitatleastoutlinesamostextraordinaryvarietyofscientificideas。(1)Thereissuggestedatheoryofmonadsandtheconceptionofthedevelopmentfromsimpletomorecomplexbodies,passingthroughthestagesoflines,plainfigures,andsolidstosensiblebodies。(2)Thedoctrineofthefourelements——fire,water,earth,andair——asthebasisofallorganismsisputforward。(3)Theidea,notmerelyofthesphericityoftheearth,butanexplicitconceptionoftheantipodes,isexpressed。(4)Aconceptionofthesanitaryinfluenceoftheairisclearlyexpressed。(5)Anideaoftheproblemsofgenerationandheredityisshown,togetherwithadistinctdisavowalofthedoctrineofspontaneousgeneration——adoctrinewhich,itmaybeadded,remainedinvogue,nevertheless,forsometwenty-fourhundredyearsafterthetimeofPythagoras。
(6)Aremarkableanalysisofmindismade,andadistinctionbetweenanimalmindsandthehumanmindisbasedonthisanalysis。Thephysiologicaldoctrinethattheheartistheorganofonedepartmentofmindisoffsetbytheclearstatementthattheremainingfactorsofmindresideinthebrain。Thisearlyrecognitionofbrainastheorganofmindmustnotbeforgotteninourlaterstudies。Itshouldberecalled,however,thataCrotonianphysician,Alemaean,ayoungercontemporaryofPythagoras,isalsocreditedwiththesametheory。(7)A
knowledgeofanatomyisatleastvaguelyforeshadowedintheassertionthatveins,arteries,andnervesarethelinksofthesoul。InthisconnectionitshouldberecalledthatPythagoraswasapracticalphysician。
Asagainstthesescientificdoctrines,however,someofthembeingatleastremarkableguessesatthetruth,attentionmustbecalledtotheconcludingparagraphofourquotation,inwhichtheoldfamiliardaemonologyisoutlined,quiteaftertheOrientalfashion。Weshallhaveoccasiontosaymoreastothisphaseofthesubjectlateron。Meantime,beforeleavingPythagoras,letusnotethathispracticalstudiesofhumanityledhimtoassertthedoctrinethat"thepropertyoffriendsiscommon,andthatfriendshipisequality。"Hisdisciples,wearetold,usedtoputalltheirpossessionstogetherinonestoreandusethemincommon。Here,then,seemingly,isthedoctrineofcommunismputtothetestofexperimentatthisearlyday。Ifitseemthatreferencetothiscarriesusbeyondtheboundsofscience,itmayberepliedthatquestionssuchasthiswillnotliebeyondtheboundsofthescienceofthenearfuture。
XENOPHANESANDPARMENIDES
ThereisawhimsicaltaleaboutPythagoras,accordingtowhichthephilosopherwaswonttodeclarethatinanearlierstatehehadvisitedHades,andhadthereseenHomerandHesiodtorturedbecauseoftheabsurdthingstheyhadsaidaboutthegods。
Apocrypbalorotherwise,thetalesuggeststhatPythagoraswasanagnosticasregardsthecurrentGreekreligionofhistime。Thesamethingisperhapstrueofmostofthegreatthinkersofthisearliestperiod。Butoneamongthemwasrememberedinlatertimesashavinghadapeculiaraversiontotheanthropomorphicconceptionsofhisfellows。ThiswasXenophanes,whowasbornatColophonprobablyabouttheyear580B。C。,andwho,afteralifeofwandering,settledfinallyinItalyandbecamethefounderoftheso-calledEleaticSchool。
AfewfragmentsofthephilosophicalpoeminwhichXenophanesexpressedhisviewshavecomedowntous,andthesefragmentsincludeatolerablydefiniteavowalofhisfaith。"Godisonesupremeamonggodsandmen,andnotlikemortalsinbodyorinmind,"saysXenophanes。Againheassertsthat"mortalssupposethatthegodsareborn(astheythemselvesare),thattheywearman’sclothingandhavehumanvoiceandbody;but,"hecontinues,"ifcattleorlionshadhandssoastopaintwiththeirhandsandproduceworksofartasmendo,theywouldpainttheirgodsandgivethembodiesinformliketheirown——horseslikehorses,cattlelikecattle。"Elsewherehesays,withgreatacumen:"Therehasnotbeenaman,norwilltherebe,whoknowsdistinctlywhatIsayaboutthegodsorinregardtoallthings。Forevenifonechanceforthemostparttosaywhatistrue,stillhewouldnotknow;buteveryonethinksthatheknows。"[6]
InthesamespiritXenophanesspeaksofthebattlesofTitans,ofgiants,andofcentaursas"fictionsofformerages。"Allthistellsofthequestioningspiritwhichdistinguishesthescientificinvestigator。Preciselywhitherthisspiritledhimwedonotknow,butthewritersofalatertimehavepreservedatraditionregardingabeliefofXenophanesthatperhapsentitleshimtobeconsideredthefatherofgeology。ThusHippolytusrecordsthatXenophanesstudiedthefossilstobefoundinquarries,anddrewfromtheirobservationremarkableconclusions。
Hiswordsareasfollows:"Xenophanesbelievesthatoncetheearthwasmingledwiththesea,butinthecourseoftimeitbecamefreedfrommoisture;andhisproofsaresuchasthese:
thatshellsarefoundinthemidstofthelandandamongthemountains,thatinthequarriesofSyracusetheimprintsofafishandofsealshadbeenfound,andinParostheimprintofananchovyatsomedepthinthestone,andinMeliteshallowimpressionsofallsortsofseaproducts。Hesaysthattheseimprintsweremadewheneverythinglongagowascoveredwithmud,andthentheimprintdriedinthemud。Further,hesaysthatallmenwillbedestroyedwhentheearthsinksintotheseaandbecomesmud,andthattheracewillbeginanewfromthebeginning;andthistransformationtakesplaceforallworlds。"[7]Here,then,weseethisearliestofpaleontologistsstudyingthefossil-bearingstrataoftheearth,anddrawingfromhisobservationsamarvellouslyscientificinduction。AlmosttwothousandyearslateranotherfamouscitizenofItaly,LeonardodaVinci,wasindependentlytothinkoutsimilarconclusionsfromlikeobservations。Butnotuntilthenineteenthcenturyofourera,sometwenty-fourhundredyearsafterthetimeofXenophanes,wastheoldGreek’sdoctrinetobeacceptedbythescientificworld。TheideasofXenophaneswereknowntohiscontemporariesand,aswesee,quotedforafewcenturiesbyhissuccessors,thentheywereignoredorquiteforgotten;andifanyphilosopherofanensuingagebeforethetimeofLeonardochampionedalikerationalexplanationofthefossils,wehavenorecordofthefact。ThegeologicaldoctrineofXenophanes,then,mustbelistedamongthoseremarkableGreekanticipationsofnineteenth-centurysciencewhichsufferedalmosttotaleclipseintheinterveningcenturies。
AmongthepupilsofXenophaneswasParmenides,thethinkerwhowasdestinedtocarryontheworkofhismasteralongthesamescientificlines,thoughatthesametimeminglinghisscientificconceptionswiththemysticismofthepoet。WehavealreadyhadoccasiontomentionthatParmenideschampionedtheideathattheearthisround;notingalsothatdoubtsexistastowhetherheorPythagorasoriginatedthisdoctrine。Noexplicitanswertothisquestioncanpossiblybehopedfor。Itseemsclear,however,thatforalongtimetheItalicSchool,towhichboththesephilosophersbelonged,hadamonopolyofthebeliefinquestion。
Parmenides,likePythagoras,iscreditedwithhavingbelievedinthemotionoftheearth,thoughtheevidencefurnishedbythewritingsofthephilosopherhimselfisnotasdemonstrativeasonecouldwish。Unfortunately,thecopyistsofalaterageweremoreconcernedwithmetaphysicalspeculationsthanwithmoretangiblethings。ButasfarasthefragmentaryreferencestotheideasofParmenidesmaybeaccepted,theydonotsupporttheideaoftheearth’smotion。Indeed,Parmenidesismadetosayexplicitly,inpreservedfragments,that"theworldisimmovable,limited,andspheroidalinform。"[8]
Nevertheless,somemoderninterpretershavefoundanoppositemeaninginParmenides。ThusRitterinterpretshimassupposing"thattheearthisinthecentrespherical,andmaintainedinrotarymotionbyitsequiponderance;arounditliecertainrings,thehighestcomposedoftherareelementfire,thenextloweracompoundoflightanddarkness,andlowestofallonewhollyofnight,whichprobablyindicatedtohismindthesurfaceoftheearth,thecentreofwhichagainheprobablyconsideredtobefire。"[9]Butthis,liketoomanyinterpretationsofancientthought,appearstoreadintothefragmentsideaswhichthewordsthemselvesdonotwarrant。Thereseemsnoreasontodoubt,however,thatParmenidesactuallyheldthedoctrineoftheearth’ssphericity。Anotherglimpseofhisastronomicaldoctrinesisfurnishedusbyafragmentwhichtellsusthatheconceivedthemorningandtheeveningstarstobethesame,adoctrinewhich,aswehaveseen,wasascribedalsotoPythagoras。Indeed,wemayrepeatthatitisquiteimpossibletodistinguishbetweentheastronomicaldoctrinesofthesetwophilosophers。
ThepoemofParmenidesinwhichthecosmogonicspeculationsoccurtreatsalsooftheoriginofman。Theauthorseemstohavehadaclearconceptionthatintelligencedependsonbodilyorganism,andthatthemoreelaboratelydevelopedtheorganismthehighertheintelligence。Butintheinterpretationofthisthoughtwearehamperedbythecharacteristicvaguenessofexpression,whichmaybestbeevidencedbyputtingbeforethereadertwoEnglishtranslationsofthesamestanza。HereisRitter’srendering,asmadeintoEnglishbyhistranslator,Morrison:
"Forexactlyaseachhasthestateofhislimbsmany-jointed,Soinvariablystandsitwithmenintheirmindandtheirreason;ForthesystemoflimbsisthatwhichthinkethinmankindAlikeinallandineach:forthoughtisthefulness。"[10]
ThesamestanzaisgiventhusbyGeorgeHenryLewes:
"Suchastoeachmanisthenatureofhismany-jointedlimbs,Suchalsoistheintelligenceofeachman;foritisThenatureoflimbs(organization)whichthinkethinmen,Bothinoneandinall;forthehighestdegreeoforganizationgivesthehighestdegreeofthought。"[11]
Hereitwillbeobservedthatthereisvirtualagreementbetweenthetranslatorsexceptastothelastclause,butthatclauseismostessential。TheGreekphraseis<grtogarpleonestinohma>。
Ritter,itwillbeobserved,rendersthis,"forthoughtisthefulness。"Lewesparaphrasesit,"forthehighestdegreeoforganizationgivesthehighestdegreeofthought。"Thedifferenceisintentional,sinceLeweshimselfcriticisesthetranslationofRitter。Ritter’stranslationiscertainlythemoreliteral,butthefactthatsuchdiversityispossiblesuggestsoneofthechiefelementsofuncertaintythathamperourinterpretationofthethoughtofantiquity。Unfortunately,themindofthecommentatorhasusuallybeendirectedtowardssuchsubtleties,ratherthantowardstheexpressionofpreciseknowledge。HenceitisthatthephilosophersofGreeceareusuallythoughtofasmeredreamers,andthattheirtruestatusasscientificdiscoverersissooftenoverlooked。Withtheseintangibilitieswehavenopresentconcernbeyondthisbaremention;forusitsufficestogainasclearanideaaswemayofthereallyscientificconceptionsofthesethinkers,leavingthesubtletiesoftheirdeductivereasoningforthemostpartuntouched。